From Leverage to Impact
The 4 Areas of Action
Four areas of impact show where purchasing can make the biggest difference:
in negotiation, structure, strategy and supplier management.
Clearly controlled. Measurably effective.
Power, Negotiation & Closing
Negotiation is not a technique.
Negotiation is power under time pressure.
Negotiation consulting in procurement means: not „arguing better“, but withstanding pressure, recognising room for manoeuvre, forcing decisions and concluding cleanly – including escalation, multi-party situations and high-stakes negotiations.
What's in here
- Negotiation Training & High-Pressure Bootcamps for purchasing and leadership teams (practical, directly relevant to real cases)
- Strategic negotiation preparationTarget values, red lines, package logic, scenarios, counter-arguments, exit plan
- BATNA/ZOPA Logic (BATNA = Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement; ZOPA = Zone Of Possible Agreement) for a clean power and room for manoeuvre analysis
- Negotiation support in real-life negotiations – until completion (incl. team roles, escalation logic, tactics/timing)
- Contract/Price Logic Index clauses, Price adjustment mechanisms, performance parameters, claim/enforcement logic
- Escalation and Multiparty Negotiations (internal/external), clearly set decision points
- High-Pressure Mental TrainingCalm, focus, completion ability in print
- Profiling / Stakeholder-Read: Behavioural patterns, interests, triggers – internal and supplier-side
Do you know what outcome is possible – or only what you would accept?
Do you negotiate or conclude?
When negotiations decide.
Structure, Steering & Purchasing Architecture
Many organisations have purchasing – but no controllable purchasing architecture.
Procurement only becomes effective when it is capable of making decisions and is not circumvented: roles, game rules, KPIs, and a governance rhythm that generates impact – including Spend under Management, Contract Compliance, and less Maverick Buying.
What's in here
- Vision & Procurement Leadership Mandate (Measurable: what should the purchase deliver?)
- Governance (centralised/decentralised/hybrid – but controllable)
- Category Management as an operating system (not as a slide)
- Demand Management / Demand control (standardise, limit, release demand – so that negotiation has an effect at all)
- KPI systems, trigger decisions (instead of producing reporting)
- Compliance mechanicsFramework agreements, release/exception process, management of off-contract (Maverick Buying)
- Maturity checks & competency checks (Organisation, Processes, Data Capability, People)
- Profiling for Key Roles (Strengths/Weaknesses, Development Plan)
Who decides finally – and how can one tell?
Do you negotiate or conclude?
When purchasing is to be more than just administration.
Rethinking and restructuring purchasing
Procurement is strategic value creation – not administration.
Procurement Transformation: from the historically evolved „ordering purchasing“ to procurement that leads, prioritises and delivers impact – with a realistic roadmap (Quick Wins + Structure) and clear stage gates.
What's in here
- Aufbau/Neuausrichtung (Roles, Processes, Decision-making paths)
- RoadmapQuick Wins + Structure (realistic, not idealised)
- Tender ManagementRFP (Request for Proposal), Lot/Package logic, Evaluation logic, Shortlist and Award decision
- Digitalisation / AI in procurement as decision support (e.g. spend analytics, contract analytics, supplier risk analytics, RFP automation) – pragmatic, results-oriented
- Risk and resilience thinking anchor in categories and awards
- Optional: Interim support for management/implementation (e.g. Interim CPO / Project Management)
Is your purchasing strategically installed – or historically evolved?
Do you have control – or just activity?
When shopping is finally supposed to have an effect.
Manage and strategically control suppliers
Supplier relationships are relationship management.
Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) means: suppliers are not managed but guided – segmentation, expectations, consequences, development – plus clear dependency and risk logic (single source, impact, reaction time).
What's in here
- Portfolio/Segmentierung, Supplier pyramid, ABC/Cluster
- Reduce and control dependencies Break up monopolies, build alternatives
- Appraisal, development, phasing out – consistently
- Supplier days as a management tool (Performance, Expectations, Roadmap, Consequences)
- OTIF control (On-Time-In-Full = punctually and completely) and Quality/Service KPIs as a management tool
- Data-driven supplier management (Supplier Risk Analytics): Risk Indicators, Early Warning Signals and Resilience Strategies
- Supplier Risk Analytics Risk logic (e.g. single source, reaction time, impact)
Who sets the rules of the game – you or your suppliers?
Do your suppliers know what you expect today and in three years?
When supplier management becomes a management task.
Which lever is the first to move for you?
In our conversation, we'll clarify which area of impact is currently making the biggest difference – and where the first measurable step lies.




